Study on the Impact of ESG Rating Discrepancies on the Sustainability of Corporate Green Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/m5gfg033Keywords:
ESG Rating Disagreement; Sustainability of Corporate Green Innovation; Financing Constraints.Abstract
As ESG principles have become increasingly influential in guiding investment strategies and corporate decisions, notable variations in ESG evaluations across different rating organizations have become a frequent occurrence. Yet, the precise mechanisms through which these variations affect corporate efforts in sustainable innovation are not fully understood. This study focuses on Chinese A-share companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen between 2015 and 2022, analyzing how divergences in ESG ratings influence the long-term viability of corporate green innovation and the underlying dynamics. The findings reveal that discrepancies in ESG ratings undermine the enduring nature of corporate green innovation. Further analysis of mechanisms indicates that limited access to financing and heightened business risks serve as critical pathways through which ESG rating divergences impair the continuity of green innovation. Results from heterogeneity analysis suggest that, in contrast to non-heavy-polluting firms and state-owned entities, the adverse effects of ESG rating divergences on green innovation persistence are more pronounced in heavy-polluting firms and non-state-owned entities. This study sheds light on the consequences of ESG rating divergences for the persistence of corporate green innovation, broadens the scope of research on ESG rating variations and the durability of green innovation, and offers empirical support for enhancing China’s ESG rating framework and fostering the long-term viability of corporate green innovation.
Downloads
References
[1] Liu, J. G., & Li, X. Y. The Impact of ESG Rating Disagreement on the Sustainability of Green Technological Innovation [J]. Social Sciences Review, 2025, 40(01): 71-82.
[2] Yao, S. S., & Duan, H. Y. Sustained Innovation and High-Quality Development of Distressed Enterprises [J]. Science and Technology Management, 2023, (05): 44-53.
[3] Hu, K., Li, X., & Li, Z. 2024. Effect of ESG Rating Disagreement on Stock Price Informativeness: Empirical Evidence from China's Capital Market [J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96.
[4] Wang, J., Wang, S., Dong, M., & Wang, H. 2024. ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns: Evidence from China [J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91.
[5] Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, Z. H., & Ma, X. S. ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns: The Moderating Effects of Internal Control and External Monitoring [J]. Research on Financial Development, 2024, (03).
[6] Lou, Q. R. ESG Information Disclosure: Legal Reflection and Institutional Construction [J]. Securities Market Herald, 2023, (03): 24-34.
[7] Chen, X. S., & Liu, H. D. Institutional Investor Shareholdings and Corporate ESG Performance [J]. Financial Forum, 2023, 28(09): 58-68.
[8] Lin, H., & Li, T. R. Green Development, Financial Support, and Corporate Value: An Empirical Test Based on Listed Companies' ESG [J]. Modern Economic Research, 2023, (02): 28-44.
[9] Wen, S. B., & Fang, Y. An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Panel Data Analysis from the Stakeholder Perspective [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2008, (10): 150-160.
[10] Bi, X. F., Xing, X. H., & Jiang, B. Q. Does Customer-Oriented Culture Promote Corporate Innovation? Empirical Evidence from Listed Manufacturing Companies in China [J]. Accounting Research, 2020, (02): 166-178.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Highlights in Business, Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







